Thermal and structural analysis of the DONES target system under steady state and transient loading conditions

Le résumé fourni par la source

One of the crucial steps in the European Roadmap to the realisation of fusion energy is the design and construction of the Demo-orientated NEutron Source (DONES) facility. DONES is a fusion-like neutron source, based on the International Fusion Materials Irradiation Facility (IFMIF) concept, aimed at qualifying and testing the materials to be used in fusion reactors. The Target System (TSY) is a crucial system as it is the component where the interactions between deuterons and a liquid lithium target, flowing on a solid surface (i.e. the Back Plate), take place to produce neutrons for irradiating the testing materials. In this regard, an investigation campaign has been performed to evaluate the thermo-mechanical behaviour of the DONES TSY under selected steady state and transient loading conditions, in light of the most recent design updates (new bellows and connection systems). The first part of the assessment concerned the analysis of the TSY under the normal operation steady state loading scenario. A detailed 3D FEM model has been set up, considering the newest updates of the TSY geometry and of the operational parameters, and a thermo-mechanical analysis has been launched. Results have been mainly checked in terms of TSY global deformation, focusing on the Back Plate and on the connecting bellows displacements, in order to exclude overlapping with the High Flux Test Module and misalignments with the beam footprint. Afterwards, since the lithium inlet temperature has been increased from 250 °C to 300 °C, a transient thermo-mechanical analysis of the TSY under the start-up loading conditions has been performed to check if it is able to withstand the hotter lithium flow according to the RCC-MRx criteria. Therefore, the reference pre-heating strategy has been adopted, assessing the thermal and mechanical behaviour of the TSY, focusing on the Back Plate. The obtained results are presented and critically discussed, suggesting important recommendations for the follow-up of the design.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.