The role of dynamic interplay exists between sympathetic and parasympathetic nerve in gastric tumorigenesis

Le résumé fourni par la source

Abstract Recent research underscores the significance of the nervous system in tumor progression. Nonetheless, understanding the intricate roles of nerves in gastric tumorigenesis remains limited. Our study aims to elucidate nerve alterations, associated key genes, and signaling pathways during gastric tumorigenesis. We enroll 257 patients with gastric precancerous lesions (GPLs) from four national cohorts. Utilizing immunohistochemistry and digital analysis, we quantified the densities of sympathetic and parasympathetic nerves, as well as Schwann cells in patient slides. We collected three mRNA expression profiles of GPL samples from the gene expression omnibus database and assessed them for nerve expression signatures, differentially expressed genes, enriched pathways, and the immune microenvironment. Parasympathetic nerve and Schwann cell densities display a progressive increase, while sympathetic nerve exhibits an inverse trend along the precancerous spectrums. Notably, CD8+ T cells, natural killer cells, and antigen‐presenting cells (APC) co‐inhibition decrease, while epithelial‐mesenchymal transition increases significantly from early to late premalignancy. Several key nerve‐regulating genes ( NTRK3 , MYBL2 , NRP1 , BCL2 , CCND1 , VEGFA , PLXNA2 , ADRB2 ), and pathways (mitogen‐activated protein kinase [MAPK]/ERK, PI3K/AKT, Wnt) emerge as potential contributors to precancerous progression. Our study reveals a dynamic relationship between sympathetic and parasympathetic nerves, characterized by a gradual increase in parasympathetic nerve and Schwann cell density, contrasting with an inverse trend in sympathetic nerve across precancerous spectrums. Targeting the interaction between tumor cells and nerves, including sympathetic and parasympathetic nerves, has emerged as a promising strategy for the prevention and treatment of gastric cancer.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.