54P Efficacy of first-line immunotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer with MET exon 14 skipping according to PD-L1 expression

Le résumé fourni par la source

METΔ14ex is the driver alteration for approximately 3% of non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) and associated with a higher PD-L1 expression, but unclear benefit from immunotherapy (IO). Seventy-eight consecutive patients with metastatic NSCLC harboring METΔex14 who received first-line IO as monotherapy or chemoimmunotherapy (CHT+IO) in 10 German academic lung cancer centers were analyzed. The median age was 72 years (range 49-86), 34 patients (44%) were female, 47 (60%) were active or former smokers, and 23 (29%) presented with brain metastases. The Eastern Cooperative Group (ECOG) performance status was 0, 1, 2 and 3 in 27 (35%), 28 (36%), 18 (23%) and 4 (5%) cases, respectively. The most common histology was adenocarcinoma (n=61, 78%). IO was given to 43 (55%) patients as monotherapy, and to 35 (45%) combined with CHT. For patients with PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) ≥50% (n=52, 67%), 1-49% (n=14, 18%) and <1% (n=12, 15%), disease control rates (DCR) were 56%, 57% and 100% (p=0.015), respectively. Other efficacy parameters including overall response rate (ORR), median progression-free survival (mPFS) and median overall survival (mOS) by PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS) and type of treatment are summarized in the table. Primary progressive disease/early death (before radiologic reassessment) under IO monotherapy, but not under CHT+IO, was significantly associated with never-smoker status (p=0.041). No significant correlations were found between smoking status and PD-L1 TPS (p=0.595). Table: 54PTPS≥50% / IO n=43TPS≥50% / CHT+IO n=9TPS 1-49% / CHT+IO n=14TPS 0% / CHT+IO n=12p-valueORR (%)355643500.599DCR (%)5467571000.030mPFS (mo)346150.520mOS (mo)14515160.690 Open table in a new tab Our exploratory analysis suggests an association between higher PD-L1 TPS and worse clinical outcomes under IO in patients with NSCLC harboring METΔ14ex. Although these results should be interpreted with caution, they contrast the favorable effect of PD-L1 expression for IO efficacy in other NSCLC and underline the need for alternative biomarkers for IO in this patient population.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.