Elderly Patients’ Outcomes following Emergency Laparotomy—Early Surgical Consultations Are Crucial
Rattachement africain : il. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
We aimed to study the relationship between mortality following emergency laparotomy (EL) in elderly patients and admission to a hospital facility, hypothesizing that patients initially admitted to a general surgery service have a better outcome. A retrospective review of the medical records of all the elderly patients (≥65 years) who underwent EL over three years was conducted in a single tertiary medical center. The outcomes evaluated include postoperative morbidity, mortality, discharge destination, and readmission. A total of 200 patients were eligible for this study; 106 (53%) were male, with a mean age of 77 ± 8.3 years. The mortality rate was 29.5% (59 patients), and 55% of all patients were discharged home after initial admission. Bowel obstruction was the most common indication for surgery (91, 45.5%). Patients undergoing an operation from non-general surgical services had higher readmission, unfavorable discharge and mortality rates, a greater incidence of stoma formation, and required a tracheostomy or were TPN-dependent (all p < 0.001). The mortality rate is higher in elderly patients needing an EL when initially admitted through a non-general surgery service. A correct and rapid initial diagnosis and decision are crucial when treating elderly individuals; initial admission to a general surgery service increases the probability of discharge home.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Elderly Patients’ Outcomes following Emergency Laparotomy—Early Surgical Consultations Are Crucial
- Date Crossref
- 23/03/2024
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.