Six‐week postoperative opioid use and pain following a randomized controlled trial evaluating multimodal analgesia for head and neck free flap patients

Résumé fourni par la source

Introduction: Head and neck malignancy treatment often involves invasive surgeries, necessitating effective postoperative pain control. However, chronic reliance on opioid medications remains a challenge for many patients after surgery. Multimodal analgesia (MMA) within enhanced recovery after surgery protocols has shown success in limiting narcotic pain medications for other cancer types. In a prior study, MMA comprising acetaminophen, ketorolac, gabapentin, and a neurogenic block reduced opioid use in the 7-day postoperative period for major head and neck reconstructive surgery. This study investigates the impact of multimodal analgesia on opioid prescription and pain during the 6-week postoperative period for patients undergoing major head and neck oncologic surgeries, aiming to understand the longer-term effects of narcotic use. Methods: The study retrospectively examined participants in a [hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation pragmatic trial to assess multimodal analgesia's long-term effectiveness in head and neck free flap surgery. Arm A received scheduled acetaminophen and as-needed opioids, while Arm B received scheduled gabapentin, ketorolac, a regional nerve block at the donor site, scheduled acetaminophen, and as-needed opioids. Retrospective data collection included opioid prescription use and pain scores up to 6 weeks after surgery, gathered from the Kansas prescription drug monitoring program, K-TRACS. Results: = .612). Conclusion: Patients with head and neck cancer treated with multimodal analgesia during the perioperative period did not exhibit significant differences in opioid use and pain within 6 weeks after discharge. To confirm these findings, a re-examination with strict measures of opioid use and scheduled pain assessments in a prospective manner is warranted. Level of Evidence: 4.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.