Gaussian process surrogate models for the properties of micro-tearing modes in spherical tokamaks
Le résumé fourni par la source
Spherical tokamaks (STs) have many desirable features that make them a suitable choice for fusion power plants. To understand their confinement properties, accurate calculation of turbulent micro-instabilities is necessary for tokamak design. Presented is a novel surrogate model for Micro-tearing modes (MTMs), the micro-instability thought to be dominant in high beta STs. Direct numerical calculation of micro-instabilities is computationally expensive and is a significant bottleneck in integrated plasma modelling. The considerable number of geometric and thermodynamic parameters, the interactions that influence these coefficients and the resolutions needed to accurately resolve these modes, makes direct numerical simulation for parameter space exploration computationally extremely challenging. However, this and the dearth of accurate reduced physics models for MTMs makes it suitable for surrogate modelling using Gaussian Process Regression, a modern machine learning technique. This paper outlines the further development of a data-driven reduced-order model across a spherical tokamak reactor-relevant parameter space utilising Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) and classification; techniques from machine learning. To build the original simple GP model these two components were used in an active learning loop to maximise the efficiency of data acquisition thus minimising computational cost. The `simple' GP was seen to show a plateau of fidelity with more data and to be under-confident, particular in areas of parameter space close to marginal stability. It is postulated that the presence of multiple sub-types of MTM could be the root cause, with the underlying function being less smooth than expected. An expansion of the model using clustering algorithms to find optimal sub models using a mixture of experts approach is shown to greatly improve the variances in the outputs of the GP model.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.