Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2024 article

Prognostic value of clinical and microbiological parameters in COVID-19: the COMEPA study

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
5Institutions déclarées
2Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : it, es. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Purpose. Clusters’ analysis may indicate distinct phenotypes and symptom profiles potentially due to differing pathophysiology and needing different clinical approaches in COVID-19. However, the research about clusters combining clinical and microbiological information is still limited. The purpose of our study was to examine the prognostic role of clusters, including clinical and microbiological parameters in terms of severity of lung involvement, in-hospital mortality, and the occurrence of long COVID. Methods. Information regarding COVID-19, mortality, severity of lung involvement derived from medical records; long COVID symptomatology was ascertained using phone calls. A k-means clustering method was considered to partition data into clusters considering typical symptoms of COVID-19 present at hospital admission and SarsCov2 variants. Results. Our analysis identified among 414 patients (mean age: 65 years; males: 59.9%) four different clusters. Cluster 1: higher prevalence of respiratory COVID symptoms at hospital admission; Cluster 2: higher frequency of non-respiratory COVID symptoms and a higher prevalence of the Alpha variant; Cluster 3: older subjects and more frequently men, reporting more severe medical conditions and with a higher prevalence of Wild type variant; Cluster 4: patients that more often reported general and gastrointestinal COVID symptoms at the admission. From a prognostic point of view, patients in cluster 3 more frequently died and were admitted in a nursing home, with significantly lower presence of long COVID symptomatology. Conclusions. Clusters combining clinical and microbiological information in individuals hospitalized with COVID-19 that had different not only different profiles, but also different prognostic values, also in terms of long COVID.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Prognostic value of clinical and microbiological parameters in COVID-19: the COMEPA study
Date Crossref
12/01/2024
Éditeur
Top Italian Scientists
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Long-Term Effects of COVID-19COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.