IgE to cyclophilins in pollen-allergic children: Epidemiologic, clinical, and diagnostic relevance of a neglected panallergen

Résumé fourni par la source

BACKGROUND: Cyclophilins are ubiquitous panallergens whose epidemiologic, diagnostic, and clinical relevance is largely unknown and whose sensitization is rarely examined in routine allergy practice. OBJECTIVE: We investigated the epidemiologic, diagnostic, and clinical relevance of cyclophilins in seasonal allergic rhinitis and its comorbidities. METHODS: We examined a random sample of 253 (25%) of 1263 Italian children with seasonal allergic rhinitis from the Panallergens in Pediatrics (PAN-PED) cohort with characterized disease phenotypes. Nested studies of sensitization prevalence, correlation, and allergen extract inhibition were performed in patients sensitized to birch pollen extract but lacking IgE to Bet v 1/2/4 (74/1263) or with highest serum level of IgE to Bet v 1 (26/1263); and in patients with sensitization to various extracts (ragweed, mugwort, pellitory, Plantago, and plane tree), but not to their respective major allergenic molecule, profilins, and polcalcins. IgE to cyclophilin was detected with recombinant Bet v 7, and extract inhibition tests were performed with the same rBet v 7. RESULTS: IgE to rBet v 7 was detected in 43 (17%) of 253 patients. It was associated with asthma (P < .028) and oral allergy syndrome (P < .017) in univariate but not multivariate analysis adjusted for IgE to profilins (Phl p 12), PR-10s (Bet v 1), and lipid transfer proteins (Pru p 3). IgE to rBet v 7 was also highly prevalent (47/74, 63%) among patients with unexplained sensitization to birch pollen extract. In patients with unexplained sensitization to ragweed, mugwort, pellitory, Plantago and plane tree pollen, the levels of IgE to those extracts correlated with the levels of IgE to rBet v 7, and they were also significantly inhibited by rBet v 7 (inhibition range 45%-74%). CONCLUSIONS: IgE sensitization to cyclophilin is frequent in pollen-allergic patients living in temperate areas and can produce "false" positive outcomes in skin prick and IgE tests to pollen extracts. Molecular diagnostic guidelines should include this panallergen family.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.