Prediction models for the flux decay profile and initial flux of microfiltration for therapeutic proteins
Rattachement africain : jp. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Microfiltration (MF) is an essential step during biopharmaceutical manufacturing. However, unexpected flux decay can occur. Although the flux decay profile and initial flux are important factors determining MF filterability, predicting them accurately is challenging, as the root cause of unexpected flux decay remains elusive. In this study, the methodology for developing a prediction model of flux decay profiles was established. First, the filtration profiles of different monodisperse polystyrene latex and silica beads of various sizes were evaluated. These results revealed that the size and surface electrostatic properties of the beads affect the flux decay profile. Taking the size and surface electrostatic properties of protein aggregates into account, we constructed a predictive model using model bead filtration profiles. We showed that this methodology was applicable to two different MF filters to predict the flux decay profile of therapeutic proteins. Because our proposed prediction model is based on normalized flux, the initial flux is required to predict the overall filtration profile. Then, we applied the Hagen-Poiseuille equation using sample viscosity values to estimate the initial flux. The developed prediction models can be used for effective MF scale-up assessment during the early stages of process development.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Prediction models for the flux decay profile and initial flux of microfiltration for therapeutic proteins
- Date Crossref
- 19/03/2024
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.