Overview of advances in ASDEX Upgrade plasma control to support critical physics research for ITER and beyond

Le résumé fourni par la source

Abstract The successful operation of fusion reactors requires plasma scenarios with good core confinement and acceptable first wall heat loads that are stable and robust to external perturbations. This poses both physical and technological challenges. One of the technologies that addresses these challenges is a complex feedback control system that supports advances in physical understanding and helps to ensure stable operating conditions. The operation of marginally stable plasmas often leads to off-normal events (such as disruptions) and feedback control can prevent these to some extent. This contribution gives an overview of the main results of the development and operation of the feedback control algorithms on ASDEX Upgrade (AUG). Fueling actuators, using a combination of gas valves and pellet injection, can simultaneously control neutral density of the divertor and the density of the plasma core above the Greenwald limit. Impurity injection is employed to control the position of the X-point radiator, allowing the creation of an ELM-suppressed H-mode with high radiation fraction. Heating actuators are used to control the plasma energy content, which supports advanced tokamak experiments and enables stable I-mode operation, and the electron temperature control, which supports turbulence studies. In control technology, AUG has pioneered the use of virtual actuators, which allow effective use of the limited number of heating actuators, adaptive control policies, and exception handling. Such technologies will also be used in ITER. Advanced nonlinear state observers (RAPTOR, RAPDENS) and codes to evaluate the power deposition properties (RABBIT, TORBEAM) are available for routine use in the AUG feedback controllers. Extensive use of the AUG discharge control system further enhances the research capabilities of this machine.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.