RNAi-Mediated Silencing of Laccase 2 in Culex pipiens Pupae via Dehydration and Soaking Results in Multiple Defects in Cuticular Development

Résumé fourni par la source

Mosquitoes transmit a range of pathogens, causing devastating effects on human health. Population genetic control strategies have been developed and successfully used for several mosquito species. The most important step in identifying potential targets for mosquito control is the understanding of gene function. RNA interference (RNAi) is a powerful tool for gene silencing which has been widely used to study gene function in insects via knockdown of expression. The success of RNAi in insects depends on the efficient delivery of dsRNA into the cells, with microinjections being the most commonly used to study mosquito gene function. However, microinjections in the pupal stage lead to significant mortality in Aedes and Culex species, and few studies have performed microinjections in Culicinae pupae. Advanced techniques, such as CRISPR/Cas9 knockout, require establishing individual mosquito lines for each gene studied, and maintaining such lines may be limited by the insect-rearing capacity of a laboratory. Moreover, at times gene knockout during early development (embryo stage) has a deleterious effect on mosquito development, precluding the analysis of gene function in the pupal and adult stages and its potential for mosquito control. There is a need for a simple procedure that can be used for the fast and reliable examination of adult gene function via RNAi knockdown. Here, we focus on the aquatic stages of the mosquito life cycle and suggest a quick and easy assay for screening the functional role of genes in Culex pipiens mosquitoes without using microinjections. By dehydration of early stage pupae and subsequent rehydration in highly concentrated dsRNA, we achieved a moderate knockdown of laccase 2, a gene that turns on in the pupal stage and is responsible for melanization and sclerotization of the adult cuticle.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.