Significant association of HLA-A26 with uveitis and gastrointestinal involvement in patients with Behçet’s disease in a multicentre study
Résumé fourni par la source
OBJECTIVES: Specific human leukocyte antigen (HLA) haplotypes are associated with Behçet's disease. Because the effects of HLA-A26 and its combination with HLA-B51 on organ involvement in Behçet's disease have not been well demonstrated, we aimed to examine them. METHODS: This multicentre, cross-sectional, observational study enrolled patients with Behçet's disease who visited Kyoto University Hospital between 2018 and 2021 or Kurashiki Central Hospital between 2006 and 2016 (n = 200). Disease severity was evaluated using the Krause score. RESULTS: Uveitis and gastrointestinal involvement were observed in 95/196 and 57/167 patients, respectively. The HLA alleles identified were HLA-B51 (n = 52/106), HLA-A26 (n = 25/88), and HLA-B51 and HLA-A26 (n = 6/88). In patients harbouring HLA-B51, the presence of HLA-A26 was associated with higher frequencies of uveitis (P = .03) and coexistence of uveitis and gastrointestinal involvement (P = .002) and higher Krause scores (P = .02). Furthermore, the presence of HLA-A26 was associated with a higher frequency of uveitis in patients with gastrointestinal involvement (P = .001) and gastrointestinal involvement in patients with uveitis (P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: Since specific HLA haplotypes and their combinations are associated with organ involvement, both HLA-A and HLA-B haplotypes should be confirmed when screening for affected organs.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Significant association of HLA-A26 with uveitis and gastrointestinal involvement in patients with Behçet’s disease in a multicentre study
- Date Crossref
- 14/03/2024
- Éditeur
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.