Aller au contenu principal
2024 conference-paper

Pneumologische Onkologie Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) therapy with standard systemic therapy in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer following progression on or after platinum-based therapy: global randomized, pivotal (phase 3) LUNAR study

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
34Institutions déclarées
17Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : at, us, in, pl, cn, es, cz, hr, rs, be, nl, ch, Zambie, Afrique du Sud, Tanzanie, Ouganda, ca. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Background : TTFields are electric fields that disrupt cancer cell viability. TTFields therapy is approved for glioblastoma and mesothelioma. The randomized, pivotal (phase 3) LUNAR study (NCT02973789) assessed the efficacy and safety of TTFields therapy with investigator’s choice of standard systemic therapy (ST; immune checkpoint inhibitor [ICI] or docetaxel [DTX], standard of care at time of study design) for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) progressing on/after platinum-based therapy. Methods : Adult patients were randomized 1:1 to TTFields+ST or ST. Primary endpoint: overall survival (OS); key secondary endpoints: OS in ICI and DTX subgroups; other secondary endpoints: adverse events (AEs) and patient-reported HRQoL assessed from baseline to 54 weeks by the validated EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire. Results: 276 patients (TTFields+ST, n=137; ST, n=139) were included. Median (m) age was 64 years (range, 22– 86), 64% were male, 57% had non-squamous NSCLC, 96% had ECOG PS 0–1, 10% had >1 prior line of ST, and 32% had prior ICI. Characteristics were balanced between arms. OS was significantly extended with TTFields+ST vs ST: mOS (95% CI) 13.2 (10.3–15.5) vs 9.9 (8.1–11.5) months (mo); HR 0.74 (95% CI 0.56–0.98); P=0.035. In the ICI subgroup (n=134), TTFields therapy significantly improved OS vs ICI alone: mOS (95% CI) 18.5 (10.6–30.3) vs 10.8 (8.2–18.4) mo; HR 0.63 (95% CI 0.41–0.96); P=0.030. In the DTX subgroup (n=142), mOS (95% CI) with TTFields+DTX vs DTX was 11.1 (8.2–14.1) vs 8.7 (6.3–11.3) mo; HR 0.81 (95% CI 0.55–1.19); P=0.28. AEs were similar for TTFields+ST (97%) vs ST (91%). 71% reported a device-related AE; most were dermatological, and 6% were grade 3. For global health status, there was no clinically meaningful (≥10 points) decline in either treatment group, or difference between treatment groups. Discussion: TTFields therapy plus ST extended OS vs ST without exacerbating systemic toxicities or adversely affecting HRQoL in patients with mNSCLC progressing on/after platinum-based therapy. Conclusion: These results warrant TTFields therapy as an option to manage mNSCLC in this setting. Publication History Article published online: 01 March 2024 © 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved. Georg Thieme Verlag Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Pneumologische Onkologie Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) therapy with standard systemic therapy in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer following progression on or after platinum-based therapy: global randomized, pivotal (phase 3) LUNAR study
Date Crossref
01/03/2024
Éditeur
Georg Thieme Verlag
Type
proceedings-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Lung Cancer Treatments and MutationsLung Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentInterstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.