Prevalence of Renal Neoplasia in Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Résumé fourni par la source
BACKGROUND: Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is a common inherited condition; however, its relationship with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) remains unclear. This paper aims to establish the prevalence of RCC and its subtypes amongst ADPKD patients. METHODS: A database search was conducted to retrieve studies reporting RCC occurrence within ADPKD patients until July 2023. Key outcomes included number and subtype of RCC cases, and number of RCCs presenting incidentally. A random-effects meta-analysis was performed. RESULTS: Our search yielded 569 articles, 16 met the inclusion criteria. Nephrectomy specimens from 1,147 ADPKD patients were identified. Of studies reporting per-kidney results (n = 13), 73 RCCs were detected amongst 1,493 kidneys, equating to a per-kidney prevalence of 4.3% (95% CI, 3.1-5.7, I2 = 15.7%). 75 ADPKD patients were found to have RCC (75/1,147), resulting in a per-person prevalence of 5.7% (95% CI, 3.7-7.9, I2 = 40.3%) (n = 16). As 7 patients had bilateral disease, 82 RCCs were detected in total. Of these, 39 were clear cell RCC, 35 were papillary and 8 were other. As such, papillary RCCs made up 41.1% (95% CI, 25.9-56.9, I2 = 18.1%) of detected cancers. The majority of RCCs were detected incidentally (72.5% [95% CI, 43.7-95.1, I2 = 66.9%]). CONCLUSION: ADPKD appears to be associated with the papillary RCC subtype. The clinical implications of these findings are unclear, however, may become apparent as outcomes and life expectancy amongst APDKD patients improve.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Prevalence of Renal Neoplasia in Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- Date Crossref
- 01/01/2024
- Éditeur
- S. Karger AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.