High-Throughput Phenotyping of Seed Quality Traits Using Imaging and Deep Learning in Dry Pea
Résumé fourni par la source
Abstract Seed traits, such as seed color and seed size, directly impact seed quality, affecting the marketability and value of dry peas [1]. Assessing seed quality is integral to a plant breeding programs to ensure optimal seed standards. This research introduced a phenotyping tool to assess seed quality traits specifically tailored for pulse crops, which integrates image processing with cutting-edge deep learning models. The proposed method is designed for automation, seamlessly processing a sequence of images while minimizing human intervention. The pipeline standardized red-green-blue (RGB) images captured from a color light box and used deep learning models to segment and detect seed features. Our method extracted up to 86 distinct seed characteristics, ranging from basic size metrics to intricate texture details and color nuances. Compared to traditional methods, our pipeline demonstrated a 95 percent similarity in seed quality assessment and increased time efficiency (from 2 weeks to 30 minutes for processing time). Specifically, we observed an improvement in the accuracy of seed trait identification by simply using an RGB value instead of a categorical, non-standard description, which allowed for an increase in the range of detectable seed quality characteristics. By integrating conventional image processing techniques with foundational deep learning models, this approach emerges as a pivotal instrument in pulse breeding programs, guaranteeing the maintenance of superior seed quality standards.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- High-Throughput Phenotyping of Seed Quality Traits Using Imaging and Deep Learning in Dry Pea
- Date Crossref
- 06/03/2024
- Éditeur
- openRxiv
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.