Manufacturing DNA in E. coli yields higher-fidelity DNA than in vitro enzymatic synthesis
Rattachement africain : ca, cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Biotechnologies such as gene therapy have brought DNA vectors to the forefront of pharmaceuticals. The quality of starting material plays a pivotal role in determining final product quality. Here, we examined the fidelity of DNA replication using enzymatic methods ( in vitro ) compared to plasmid DNA produced in vivo in E. coli . Next-generation sequencing approaches rely on in vitro polymerases, which have inherent limitations in sensitivity. To address this challenge, we introduce a novel assay based on loss-of-function (LOF) mutations in the conditionally toxic sacB gene. Our findings show that DNA production in E. coli results in significantly fewer LOF mutations (80- to 3,000-fold less) compared to enzymatic DNA replication methods such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and rolling circle amplification (RCA). These results suggest that using DNA produced by PCR or RCA may introduce a substantial number of mutation impurities, potentially affecting the quality and yield of final pharmaceutical products. Our study underscores that DNA synthesized in vitro has a significantly higher mutation rate than DNA produced traditionally in E. coli . Therefore, utilizing in vitro enzymatically produced DNA in biotechnology and biomanufacturing may entail considerable fidelity-related risks, while using DNA starting material derived from E. coli substantially mitigates this risk.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Manufacturing DNA in E. coli yields higher-fidelity DNA than in vitro enzymatic synthesis
- Date Crossref
- 01/06/2024
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.