Neuropsychological characteristics of drug resistant epilepsy patients with and without comorbid functional seizures

Le résumé fourni par la source

INTRODUCTION: Neuropsychological testing is a mandatory component in the evaluation of drug resistant epilepsy. The results of testing may assist with both the localization of an epilepsy as well as assessment of surgical risk. Previous studies have demonstrated differences in the neuropsychological performance of patients with epilepsy and functional seizures. We hypothesized that comorbid functional seizures could potentially influence neuropsychological test performance. Therefore, we evaluated whether there is a difference in the neuropsychological test results between drug resistant epilepsy patients with and without comorbid functional seizures. METHOD: Neuropsychological test results were compared between 25 patients with drug resistant focal epilepsy and 25 patients that also had documented functional seizures. Univariate analyses and multiple logistic regression models were used to both assess performance differences between the groups and to assess whether test results could be used to accurately identify which patients had comorbid functional seizures. RESULTS: Epilepsy patients with comorbid functional seizures performed significantly worse on the FAS Verbal Fluency Test compared to ES patients (p = 0.047). Digit Span Backwards (p = 0.10), Digit Span Forwards (p = 0.14) and Working Memory Index (p = 0.10) tended to be lower in the epilepsy and functional seizures group but was not statistically significant. A multiple logistic regression model using the results of four neuropsychological tests was able to identify patients with comorbid functional seizures with 83.33% accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: There are appeared to be some differences in the neuropsychological performance among drug resistant epilepsy patients based on whether they have comorbid functional seizures. These findings may have relevant implications for the interpretation of neuropsychological test results.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.