Measurement and Correlation of Solubilities of γ-2,4,6,8,10,12-Hexanitro-2,4,6,8,10,12-hexaazaisowurtzitane (γ-CL-20) in Six Pure Solvents and Four Different Chloralkane + Ethyl Acetate Binary Solvents from 283.15 to 323.15 K
Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
2,4,6,8,10,12-Hexanitro-2,4,6,8,10,12-hexaazaisowurtzitane (CL-20) has the highest crystal density and detonation speed among high-energy materials and is widely used in military and aerospace industries. However, data on the solubility of γ-CL-20 are rarely reported in the open literature. Considering the solubility is important to the CL-20 crystallization process, the solubility of γ-CL-20 in six pure solvents (ethyl acetate, methanol, ethanol, n -propanol, n -butanol, isopropanol) and four binary solvents (dichloromethane + ethyl acetate, 1,2-dichloroethane + ethyl acetate, chloroform + ethyl acetate, tetrachloromethane + ethyl acetate) has been measured by the laser dynamic method in the temperature range of 283.15–323.15 K. The measured solubility data in pure solvents were fitted by the Apelblat equation, the Yaws model, and the polynomial empirical equation. The Apelblat equation, the Yaws model, and the modified Jouyban–Acree model were adopted to correlate the experimental solubility data in four binary solvents. This work can guide further crystallization research of γ-CL-20.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Measurement and Correlation of Solubilities of γ-2,4,6,8,10,12-Hexanitro-2,4,6,8,10,12-hexaazaisowurtzitane (γ-CL-20) in Six Pure Solvents and Four Different Chloralkane + Ethyl Acetate Binary Solvents from 283.15 to 323.15 K
- Date Crossref
- 27/02/2024
- Éditeur
- American Chemical Society (ACS)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.