Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2024 article

Modified technique for recovery of nematode infective larvae in different grass genera

1Citations signalées — pas une note de qualité
6Institutions déclarées
3Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Résumé fourni par la source

Most gastrointestinal nematodes are in the grazing environment. As an option, the study aimed to evaluate an alternative technique for recovery of infecting larvae in various grass genera: Tyfton 85 (Cynodon dactylon) Capim–Vencedor (Megathyrsus maximus) Capim–Gordura (Melinis minutiflora) Capim–Marandu (Brachiaria brizantha), Setaria (Setaria anceps) Capim-Humidicula (Brachiaria humidicula) and Andropogon (Andropogon gayanus). The collection of samples and procedures were developed at the Institute of Animal Science, Nova Odessa, Brazil. The grasses came from isolated paddocks. Three subsamples were used: 1-control sample (AC1); 2-control frozen sample (ACC2); 3-infested sample (AI). AC1, after the process of larvae recoveries, served as control, the rest was frozen. After de-freezing, it was divided into two samples (ACC2 and AI). In ACC2, no larvae were observed. AI was infested with 1600 ± 30 L3 larvae of trichostrongylids, recovered from sheep manure. The larvae recovery procedures were applied to the samples in the three periods. The overall mean of recovery (±SD) and percentage of success was estimated (SISVAR®) in 1544.63 ± 1.31 larvae, 96.54 ± 17% respectively. There were no differences between grass genera, as well as between weeks, with near recovery numbers (p>0.05). The technique had satisfactory results in a short time.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Modified technique for recovery of nematode infective larvae in different grass genera
Date Crossref
21/02/2024
Éditeur
South Florida Publishing LLC
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Sujets associés

Nematode management and characterization studiesEntomopathogenic Microorganisms in Pest ControlInsect and Pesticide Research

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Recherche à la demande dans Crossref et Europe PMC, sans clé ; OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant requis, aucune réponse conservée. Sources et limites.