Treatment outcomes for maculopathy secondary to retinal vein occlusion in Afghanistan
Rattachement africain : af, gb. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to investigate the efficacy of intravitreal antivascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy in the treatment of macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusion (RVO) in Afghanistan. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted of all RVO cases that underwent intravitreal ant-VEGF injection at the two leading hospitals in Kabul. The main outcome measures were visual acuity and central retinal thickness as determined by optical coherence tomography. Information was also collected on the distance traveled by each patient and the frequency of injections. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-five eyes of 121 patients (86 males) with RVO were identified as having undergone treatment, with a mean age of 53.1 years (range 20–80). The only agent used was bevacizumab. The mean central retinal thickness reduced from 624.2 ± 24.9 mm at the baseline to 257.8 ± 5.7 mm following treatment ( P < 0.001). There was a small increase in visual acuity from 1.33 LogMAR at the baseline to 1.13 LogMAR following the most recent injection ( P = 0.03, paired t -test). The mean distance traveled by patients was 173.9 km (range 2–447 km). CONCLUSION: Despite the challenges of health-care provision in Afghanistan, this review shows that the use of intravitreal bevacizumab has provided an effective treatment for macular edema after RVO.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Treatment outcomes for maculopathy secondary to retinal vein occlusion in Afghanistan
- Date Crossref
- 01/01/2024
- Éditeur
- Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.