Efficacy and Safety of a DOAC Compared to Unfractionated Heparin and A Low Molecular Weight Heparin in the Prevention of Thromboembolism in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients

Le résumé fourni par la source

Background: Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) patients are at risk of thromboembolic events, making thromboprophylaxis crucial. Objectives: This study aimed to compare apixaban, a direct factor Xa inhibitor (DOAC), with dalteparin and unfractionated heparin for thromboprophylaxis in HSCT recipients. The safety outcome included the assessment of hemorrhagic events. Methods: In this open-label randomized clinical trial, 182 HSCT recipients were divided into three groups: Apixaban (n = 61, 2.5 mg two times a day), dalteparin (n = 59, 5000 IU daily), and unfractionated heparin (n = 62, 5000 IU twice daily). These anticoagulant regimens were administered after central vein catheterization and during hospitalization. The primary clinical outcome was the risk of thrombosis, and the secondary outcome was the rate of bleeding. Relevant laboratory results were analyzed using appropriate statistical tests. Results: Among the 61 patients in the apixaban group, six experienced thrombosis (9.83%), with four (6.65%) of them on anticoagulants. In the dalteparin group, three patients (5%) developed thrombosis, two of whom (3.38%) were on anticoagulants. In the heparin group, all four thrombosis cases (6.4%) occurred in patients on anticoagulants (P = 0.543 overall and P = 0.776 in anticoagulant users). Only two cases of bleeding were reported (1.09% overall), one in the dalteparin group (1.69%) and the other in the apixaban group (1.63%). Conclusions: Apixaban, dalteparin, and heparin demonstrated similar effectiveness in preventing thromboembolism in HSCT recipients. Furthermore, the comparison of bleeding rates across the study groups did not reveal significant differences. Larger studies with higher event rates may yield more precise conclusions.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.