Use of immune-modulating agents to regulate hyperinflammation in severe COVID-19; the assessment of tocilizumab use in combination with steroids

Le résumé fourni par la source

Abstract Introduction COVID-19 infection might lead to hyperinflammatory state in severe cases leading to devastating outcomes. Immune modulation using steroids or other immune modulators can regulate the intensity of inflammatory response; however, this theory has not been adequately assessed in practice. The current study aims to investigate the use of corticosteroids alone or in combination with tocilizumab for the treatment of patients with severe COVID-19. Methods The current retrospective cross-sectional study has been conducted on 168 patients with severe COVID-19 infection who were categorized into three treatment groups of A: primary treatment with high-dose methylprednisolone (> 1 mg/kg) continued with tocilizumab; B: primary treatment with low-dose methylprednisolone (< 1 mg/kg) continued with tocilizumab and C: treatment with high-dose methylprednisolone (> 1 mg/kg) only. The parameters including clinical outcome, laboratory parameters, length of hospitalization, intensive care unit (ICU) admission requirement and drug-related adverse events were compared between the groups. Results The outcomes were significantly better in group B considering the shorter length of ICU stay, lower CRP, LDH, and higher oxygen saturation and platelet count in group B than the other groups (P-value < 0.05). Logistic regression assessment in crude and adjusted models revealed increased risks of mortality, the incidence of nosocomial infection and the incidence of adverse effects, including hepatic dysfunction, renal dysfunction and GIB in both groups A and C compared with group B (P-value < 0.05). Conclusion Based on the findings of this study, low-dose steroid continued with tocilizumab was superior over high-dose steroid alone or in combination with tocilizumab in terms of all evaluated parameters.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.