Eye tracking for tele-robotic surgery: a comparative evaluation of head-worn solutions
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Purpose: Metrics derived from eye-gaze-tracking and pupillometry show promise for cognitive load assessment, potentially enhancing training and patient safety through user-specific feedback in tele-robotic surgery. However, current eye-tracking solutions’ effectiveness in tele-robotic surgery is uncertain compared to everyday situations due to close-range interactions causing extreme pupil angles and occlusions. To assess the effectiveness of modern eye-gaze-tracking solutions in tele-robotic surgery, we compare the Tobii Pro 3 Glasses and Pupil Labs Core, evaluating their pupil diameter and gaze stability when integrated with the da Vinci Research Kit (dVRK). Methods: The study protocol includes a nine-point gaze calibration followed by pick-and-place task using the dVRK and is repeated three times. After a final calibration, users view a 3x3 grid of AprilTags, focusing on each marker for 10 seconds, to evaluate gaze stability across dVRK-screen positions with the L2-norm. Different gaze calibrations assess calibration’s temporal deterioration due to head movements. Pupil diameter stability is evaluated using the FFT from the pupil diameter during the pick-and-place tasks. Users perform this routine with both head-worn eye-tracking systems. Results: Data collected from ten users indicate comparable pupil diameter stability. FFTs of pupil diameters show similar amplitudes in high-frequency components. Tobii Glasses show more temporal gaze stability compared to Pupil Labs, though both eye trackers yield a similar 4cm error in gaze estimation without an outdated calibration. Conclusion: Both eye trackers demonstrate similar stability of the pupil diameter and gaze, when the calibration is not outdated, indicating comparable eye-tracking and pupillometry performance in tele-robotic surgery settings.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Eye tracking for tele-robotic surgery: a comparative evaluation of head-worn solutions
- Date Crossref
- 29/03/2024
- Éditeur
- SPIE
- Type
- proceedings-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
Johns Hopkins University pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Vanderbilt University pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Johns Hopkins Univ. (United States) pays non établi dans la noticeInstitution
-
Johns Hopkins Medical Institute (United States) pays non établi dans la noticeStructure de recherche
-
Vanderbilt Univ. (United States) pays non établi dans la noticeInstitution
Johns Hopkins University, Vanderbilt University et Johns Hopkins Univ. (United States), avec 2 autres affiliations.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.