Estimating excess mortality and economic burden of Clostridioides difficile infections and recurrences during 2015-2019: The RECUR England study
Résumé fourni par la source
OBJECTIVES: To generate real-world evidence on all-cause mortality and economic burden of Clostridioides difficile infections (CDIs) and recurrences (rCDIs) in England. METHODS: We conducted a cohort study using retrospective data from Clinical Practice Research Datalink linked to Hospital Episode Statistics. Patients diagnosed with CDI in hospital and community settings during 2015-2018 were included and followed for ≥1 year. All-cause mortality was described at 6, 12, and 24 months. Healthcare resource usage (HCRU) and associated costs were assessed at 12 months of follow-up. A cohort of non-CDI patients, matched by demographic and clinical characteristics including Charlson Comorbidity Index score, was used to assess excess mortality and incremental costs of HCRU. RESULTS: All-cause mortality among CDI patients at 6, 12, and 24 months was 15.87%, 20.37%, and 27.03%, respectively. A higher proportion of rCDI patients died at any point during follow-up. Compared with matched non-CDI patients, excess mortality was highest at 6 months with 1.81 and 2.53 deaths per 100 patient-months among CDI and ≥1 rCDI patients. Hospitalizations were the main drivers of costs, with an incremental cost of £1209.21 per CDI patient. HCRU and costs increased with rCDIs. CONCLUSION: CDI poses a substantial mortality and economic burden, further amplified by rCDIs.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Estimating excess mortality and economic burden of Clostridioides difficile infections and recurrences during 2015-2019: The RECUR England study
- Date Crossref
- 01/05/2024
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.