Review of: "On a New Two Point Taylor Expansion With Applications"
Rattachement africain : au. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
under review introduces a new two-points Taylor expansion. The paper is well-written, and a number of examples supporting the theory are demonstrated. However, according to my opinion, the paper is not well-motivated. On the one hand, it is shown that the method has advantage compared to the usual Taylor expansion. But there are no real comments related to the two-points Taylor expansions that are earlier known from the literature. It is not clear to me why we need this new method. Is the proposed method better than the earlier one? If it is so, the author needs to explain why the earlier method is not so good. Or in which case one method is better that another, and in which case not. The example compares the result of the proposed method with single-point expansion and with the function itself. In the case of this paper, the accent should be on comparison of two different two-points Taylor expansions. In addition, it would be nice to provide a realistic example similar to that in different papers in the area. For the above reasons, I do not recommend publication of this paper in the present form.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Review of: "On a New Two Point Taylor Expansion With Applications"
- Date Crossref
- 09/02/2024
- Éditeur
- Qeios Ltd
- Type
- peer-review
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.