In-phase and opposed-phase Dixon chemical shift imaging for the assessment of skeletal marrow lesions: comparison of measurements from longitudinal sequences to those from axial sequences

Le résumé fourni par la source

OBJECTIVE: In-phase and opposed-phase chemical shift imaging (CSI) is a useful technique for assessing skeletal lesions. This study determined the frequency of significant differences in measurements obtained from longitudinal (coronal or sagittal) sequences to those obtained from axial sequences. METHODS: Chemical shift imaging was undertaken in 96 consecutive patients referred from the Musculoskeletal Sarcoma and Spinal Oncology services for assessment of possible bone tumours as part of a standard tumour protocol, which included turbo spin echo and inversion recovery sequences. For spinal lesions, CSI was obtained in the sagittal and axial planes, while for all other sites, it was obtained in the coronal and axial planes. RESULTS: The study included 49 (51.0%) males and 47 (49.0%) females with mean age 42.4 years (range 2-91 years). In 4 cases, 2 individual lesions were assessed, making a total of 100 lesions. Based on typical imaging features (n = 57) or histology (n = 43), 22 lesions (22%) were classified as non-neoplastic, 44 (44%) as benign neoplasms, 6 (6%) as intermediate-grade neoplasms, and 28 (28%) as malignant neoplasms. A significant discrepancy, wherein a lesion was classified as fat-containing (% SI drop >20%-25%) in the longitudinal plane, while in the axial plane it was classified as fat-replacing (% SI drop <20%-25%), or vice versa, occurred in 9%-14% of cases. However, this discrepancy had no appreciable effect on overall diagnostic accuracy, which was calculated at 79% for the longitudinal plane and 75%-80% for the axial plane. CONCLUSIONS: Significant differences in CSI measurements occur in 9%-14% of cases based on imaging plane, but with no significant effect on diagnostic accuracy. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Radiologists should be aware that CSI measurements in different planes appear to have significant differences in up to 14% of lesions. However, diagnostic accuracy does not seem to be significantly affected.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.