Fragility Analysis and Resilience Assessment of the Single-Column Pier Steel-Concrete Composite Bridge Subjected to Seismic Loads
Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract With the advantages of a small footprint, wide under-bridge view, and beautiful appearance, single-column pier bridges are widely used in urban bridge networks. However, single-column pier bridges are prone to damage during earthquakes or heavy vehicle use, which can seriously affect normal operations and postdisaster recoveries. Therefore, there is an urgent need to carry out seismic resilience assessments of single-column pier bridges and formulate disaster prevention and mitigation measures from the aspects of design, maintenance, and postearthquake recovery. This paper first establishes a resilience assessment framework for the single-column pier bridge and optimizes a functionality recovery model after an earthquake. Then, a numerical model of a sample bridge is built for resilience fragility analysis. Nonlinear dynamic time history analysis is performed to build a probabilistic seismic demand model, and moment–curvature analysis is performed to build a probabilistic seismic capacity model. Finally, a seismic resilience assessment of the single-column pier bridge is obtained based on the seismic fragility, and a sensitivity analysis is carried out for the pier height, pier section dimension, span and vehicle load level to improve the resilience of the single-column pier bridge.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Fragility Analysis and Resilience Assessment of the Single-Column Pier Steel-Concrete Composite Bridge Subjected to Seismic Loads
- Date Crossref
- 07/03/2024
- Éditeur
- ASME International
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.