The Effect of a Loading Dose Regimen in the Switch to Brolucizumab for Patients with Aflibercept-Resistant nAMD

Le résumé fourni par la source

Purpose. To evaluate the one-year outcomes of switching to brolucizumab with and without a loading dose regimen (three monthly injections) in eyes with aflibercept-resistant neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). Methods. We retrospectively studied nAMD patients who had retinal exudate under bimonthly injections of aflibercept and were switched to brolucizumab from aflibercept. Patients were grouped into intravitreal brolucizumab injection (IVBr) with a loading dose regimen (loading group) and without a loading dose regimen (nonloading group). We assessed the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central retinal thickness (CRT) at the fovea, subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT), IVBr status (number of injections and last injection interval), and retinal exudate status on optical coherence tomography. Results. Overall, 52 eyes received ≥1 IVBr; 26 eyes received ≥3 IVBr with 12-month follow-up. A total of 13 eyes in the loading group and 13 eyes in the nonloading group were reviewed. One year after switching, BCVA changed from 0.28 ± 0.25 to 0.19 ± 0.28 in the loading group ( P=0.28 ) and from 0.25 ± 0.20 to 0.23 ± 0.25 in the nonloading group ( P=0.92 ). The mean CRT decreased from 263.6 ± 40.7 µm to 221.7 ± 54.6 µm in the loading group ( P=0.03 ), while it only changed from 244.9 ± 77.2 µm to 221.0 ± 78.7 µm in the nonloading group ( P=0.26 ). Both the loading and nonloading groups achieved 69% dry macula. The number of injections received was significantly higher in the loading group (7.6 ± 0.6 vs. 6.8 ± 0.4, P < 0.001 ). Two patients (4.2%) developed intraocular inflammation. Conclusion. Switching to brolucizumab from aflibercept for eyes with nAMD with resistance to bimonthly injections of aflibercept is a valuable treatment option with and without the loading regimen. This trial is registered with UMIN000023676.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.