A Prospective Multicenter ≥2 Years Clinical Study of the Active Apex Correction (APC) Technique in Early Onset Scoliosis (EOS) Patients
Rattachement africain : lb, ps, us, jo, in. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
STUDY DESIGN: prospective multicenter study. OBJECTIVES: Active apex correction (APC) is posterior tethering technique for correction of early onset scoliosis (EOS) via reverse modulation at the apex. Active apex correction has been increasingly used worldwide. This study aimed to assess short-term outcomes of multicenter study with ≥2 years of APC on spine length, curve correction, complications, unplanned surgeries, and proposed low crankshaft phenomena incidence. METHODS: Prospective multicenter study including 24 EOS patients treated by APC; involves inserting and compressing pedicle screws on convex side of apex proximal and distal to most wedged vertebra allowing apex modulation according to Hueter-Volkmann law. Excluded patients with <2 years follow-up whom APC was not primary surgery. RESULTS: = .25). 9 complications requiring 3 unplanned surgeries recorded in all patients including 2 broken rods, 2 adding-on and 4 screw dislodgement. CONCLUSION: Active apex correction is a novel technique that has been incorporated in several countries as treatment modality for EOS. Short-term outcomes are promising in terms of clinical improvement, complication rates and decreased need for multiple operations or unplanned surgeries.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- A Prospective Multicenter ≥2 Years Clinical Study of the Active Apex Correction (APC) Technique in Early Onset Scoliosis (EOS) Patients
- Date Crossref
- 24/01/2024
- Éditeur
- SAGE Publications
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.