Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2021 article

Effectiveness of Transarterial Chemoembolization-First Treatment for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
0Institutions déclarées
0Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Le résumé fourni par la source

Sung Won Chung,1,* Min Kyung Park,1,* Young Youn Cho,1,2,* Youngsu Park,1 Cheol-Hyung Lee,1 Hyunwoo Oh,1 Heejoon Jang,1 Minseok Albert Kim,1 Sun Woong Kim,1 Joon Yeul Nam,1 Yun Bin Lee,1 Eun Ju Cho,1 Su Jong Yu,1 Hyo-Cheol Kim,3 Yoon Jun Kim,1 Jin Wook Chung,3 Jung-Hwan Yoon,1 Jeong-Hoon Lee1 1Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea; 2Department of Internal Medicine, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Seoul, Korea; 3Department of Radiology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea*These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Jeong-Hoon LeeDepartment of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-Ro, Jongno-Gu, Seoul, 03080, KoreaTel +82-2-2072-2228Fax +82-2-743-6701Email pindra@empal.comBackground: Still in real-world practice, advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients are treated with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). This study compared the therapeutic effectiveness of initial TACE treatment and initial sorafenib treatment in advanced HCC patients.Patient and Methods: Advanced HCC patients initially treated with sorafenib or TACE were included in this study. Treatment crossover due to an unfavorable response to initial treatment was allowed. Propensity score (PS) matching was applied for balancing baseline characteristics. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS) and the secondary outcomes included tumor response.Results: A total of 554 patients were included in this study: 85 were initially treated with sorafenib (the sorafenib-first group) and 469 with TACE (the TACE-first group). In the entire cohort, the TACE-first group was associated with lower risk of death [adjusted hazard ratio (HR)=0.75, P=0.04]. In the PS-matched cohort (85 patients per group), the TACE-first group showed longer OS than the sorafenib-first group in both univariable (HR=0.68, P=0.02) and multivariable analyses (adjusted HR=0.58, P=0.002). Specifically, within both the entire and the PS-matched cohorts, the TACE-first group showed longer OS in subgroups with major portal vein tumor thrombosis (HR=0.72, P=0.048; HR=0.52, P=0.003) or infiltrative HCC (HR=0.42, P< 0.001; HR=0.30, P=0.004, respectively). The objective response rate was higher in the TACE-first group (29.3% vs 14.7%, P=0.03) within the PS-matched cohort.Conclusion: For advanced HCC, initial TACE leads to longer OS with a more favorable tumor response than initial sorafenib treatment. Intrahepatic tumor control with initial locoregional therapy may be a potent strategy for advanced HCC.Keywords: liver cancer, transarterial therapy, locoregional therapy, tyrosine kinase inhibitor

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

Aucun DOI disponible pour le contrôle Crossref.

Les sujets associés

Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and PrognosisRenal cell carcinoma treatmentCancer Mechanisms and Therapy

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.