Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2024 article

The predictive role of symptoms in COVID-19 diagnostic models: A longitudinal insight

6Citations signalées — pas une note de qualité
54Institutions déclarées
5Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Résumé fourni par la source

To investigate the symptoms of SARS-CoV-2 infection, their dynamics and their discriminatory power for the disease using longitudinally, prospectively collected information reported at the time of their occurrence. We have analysed data from a large phase 3 clinical UK COVID-19 vaccine trial. The alpha variant was the predominant strain. Participants were assessed for SARS-CoV-2 infection via nasal/throat PCR at recruitment, vaccination appointments, and when symptomatic. Statistical techniques were implemented to infer estimates representative of the UK population, accounting for multiple symptomatic episodes associated with one individual. An optimal diagnostic model for SARS-CoV-2 infection was derived. The 4-month prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 was 2.1%; increasing to 19.4% (16.0%-22.7%) in participants reporting loss of appetite and 31.9% (27.1%-36.8%) in those with anosmia/ageusia. The model identified anosmia and/or ageusia, fever, congestion, and cough to be significantly associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Symptoms' dynamics were vastly different in the two groups; after a slow start peaking later and lasting longer in PCR+ participants, whilst exhibiting a consistent decline in PCR- participants, with, on average, fewer than 3 days of symptoms reported. Anosmia/ageusia peaked late in confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection (day 12), indicating a low discrimination power for early disease diagnosis.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
The predictive role of symptoms in COVID-19 diagnostic models: A longitudinal insight
Date Crossref
01/01/2024
Éditeur
Cambridge University Press (CUP)
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Institutions déclarées

National Health ServiceSt George's, University of LondonSt George’s University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustOxford University Hospitals NHS TrustStepping Hill HospitalChelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation TrustImperial College LondonRoyal Cornwall Hospital TrustRoyal Cornwall HospitalRoyal Free London NHS Foundation TrustThe Royal Free HospitalUniversity College LondonJames Cook University HospitalSouth Tees Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustKing's College - North CarolinaKing's College LondonGuy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation TrustThomas FoundationMedical Research CouncilLakeside LabsUniversity Hospitals of Morecambe Bay NHS Foundation TrustHexham General HospitalNorfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustSalford Royal NHS Foundation TrustSalford Royal HospitalBirmingham Research ParkSynexus (United Kingdom)Queen's University BelfastMerseytravelOxford Health NHS Foundation TrustWarneford HospitalUniversity of OxfordLeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS TrustMicrobiology SocietyUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation TrustAdvanced Defence Materials (United Kingdom)Betsi Cadwaladr University Health BoardBangor UniversityUniversity of NottinghamHaywood Community HospitalMidlands Partnership NHS Foundation TrustNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchBradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation TrustKeele UniversityRoyal Devon and Exeter HospitalEast Suffolk and North Essex NHS Foundation TrustUniversity of AberdeenAberdeen Royal InfirmaryEpsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS TrustMRC University of Glasgow Centre for Virus ResearchQueen Elizabeth University HospitalUniversity of GlasgowUniversity of LondonInstitute of Infection and Immunity

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Sujets associés

Olfactory and Sensory Function StudiesSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchLong-Term Effects of COVID-19

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Recherche à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé ; OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant requis, aucune donnée externe enregistrée en base. Sources et limites.