The Role of Genetic Analysis in Distinguishing Multifocal and Multicentric Glioblastomas: An Illustrative Case
Résumé fourni par la source
Introduction: Glioblastomas can manifest as multiple, simultaneous, noncontiguous lesions. We genetically analyzed multiple glioblastomas and discuss their etiological origins in this report. Case Presentation: We present the case of a 47-year-old woman who presented with memory impairment and left partial paralysis. Radiographic imaging revealed three apparently noncontiguous lesions in the right temporal and parietal lobes extending into the corpus callosum, leading to diagnosis of multicentric glioblastomas. All three lesions were excised. Genetic analysis of the lesions revealed a TERT promoter C228T mutation, a roughly equivalent amplification of EGFR, and homozygous deletion of CDKN2A/B exclusively in the two contrast-enhanced lesions. Additionally, the contrast-enhanced lesions exhibited the same two-base pair mutations of PTEN, whereas the non-enhanced lesion showed a partially distinct 13-base pair mutation. The other genetic characteristics were consistent. Rather than each having arisen de novo, we believe that they had developed by infiltration and are therefore best classified as multifocal glioblastomas. Conclusion: Our findings underscore anew the possibility of infiltration by glioblastomas, even within regions devoid of signal alterations on T2-weighted images or fluid-attenuated inversion recovery images. Genetic analysis can play a crucial role in differentiating whether multiple glioblastomas are multifocal or multicentric.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- The Role of Genetic Analysis in Distinguishing Multifocal and Multicentric Glioblastomas: An Illustrative Case
- Date Crossref
- 22/01/2024
- Éditeur
- S. Karger AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.