Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2024 conference-abstract

Microscopic residual disease (MRD) monitoring with circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) across gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies.

0Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
4Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

176 Background: ctDNA is a powerful tool that can detect early evidence of tumor relapse, or MRD. There are limited studies characterizing the performance of ctDNA in non-colorectal GI cancer patients (pts). We describe the clinical outcomes of GI cancer pts who underwent real-world MRD testing at our institution. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed GI cancer pts with ≥1 ctDNA test (Natera, Inc) ordered for MRD testing between June 2020-August 2022. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize rates of ctDNA positivity (ctDNA+) and relapse rates (RR). Median relapse-free survival (mRFS) and overall survival (mOS) were calculated using Kaplan-Meier method, group comparisons by log-rank test, and hazard ratios (HR) by Cox proportional hazard models. Associations between initial mean tumor molecules per milliliter (MTM/mL) (continuous variable) and clinical factors were assessed by Kruskal-Wallis or Wilcoxon Rank-sum tests. Results: ctDNA testing was successful in 222/228 pts (table). The median follow-up was 15 months (mo) (Interquartile Range 8.6-24.7). 61/222 (27.5%) of pts had ≥1 ctDNA+ test of which 59% had relapse on their next scan obtained after a median of 40 days from the first + test. Of all relapsed pts (62/222), ctDNA detected relapse before imaging in 69.4% with a median lead time of 57 days. The positive and negative predictive values of ctDNA for relapse were 82% and 92.5%, respectively. The mRFS was 10.8 mo vs. not reached (NR) (HR 18.6; p<0.0001) and mOS 43.1 mo vs. NR (HR 5.0; p=0.002) in anytime vs. never ctDNA+ pts with similar trends in the colorectal and pancreas subgroups. Of ctDNA+ pts with >1 test, 49.2% (29/59) cleared ctDNA with 79.3% of clearances on/after therapy. Between ctDNA clearers and non-clearers, RR were 72.4% vs. 93.3%, mRFS 12.4 vs. 7.6 mo (HR 0.3; p=0.6), and mOS NR vs. 43.1 mo (log-rank test p=0.01). No significant associations existed between initial MTM/mL and tumor types (p=0.6), relapse status (p=0.2), or number of relapse sites (p=0.4). Conclusions: ctDNA is a prognostic tool able to detect early relapse with high accuracy in GI cancers. The initial MTM/mL in ctDNA+ pts did not correlate with tumor histology or relapse patterns. Pts clearing ctDNA tended to have improved outcomes; however, RRs were higher than anticipated. More pts and longer follow up will help characterize the performance of ctDNA across rarer GI subtypes. [Table: see text]

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Microscopic residual disease (MRD) monitoring with circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) across gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies.
Date Crossref
20/01/2024
Éditeur
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Où se fait cette recherche

  • Georgetown University Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center pays non établi dans la notice
    Université ou école supérieure
  • MedStar Georgetown University Hospital pays non établi dans la notice
    Établissement de santé
  • Georgetown University Medical Center pays non établi dans la notice
    Établissement de santé
  • MedStar Washington Hospital Center pays non établi dans la notice
    Établissement de santé

Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center — Georgetown University, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital et Georgetown University Medical Center, avec 1 autre affiliation.

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Cancer Genomics and DiagnosticsGenetic factors in colorectal cancerColorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.