Tumor Burden of Iodine-Avid Bone Metastatic Thyroid Cancer Identified via 18F-Sodium Fluoride PET/CT Imaging
Rattachement africain : it. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Background: Patients with differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) are referred to radioactive 131I (RAI) therapy and post-therapy 131I whole-body scintigraphy (WBS) to identify local and/or remote metastases. Positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) imaging with 18F-fluoro-D-glucose (FDG) or 18F-sodium fluoride (NaF) may also be used with these patients for the evaluation of bone metastases. We compared the role of 18F-NaF PET/CT and 18F-FDG-PET/CT in patients with DTC and documented bone metastases at post-therapy WBS. Methods: Ten consecutive DTC patients with iodine avid bone metastasis at post-therapy WBS referred to 18F-NaF PET/CT and 18F-FDG PET/CT were studied. The findings of the three imaging procedures were compared for abnormal detection rates and concordance. Results: At post-therapy 131I WBS, all patients had skeletal involvement with a total of 21 bone iodine avid lesions. At 18F-FDG PET/TC, 19 bone lesions demonstrated increased tracer uptake and CT pathological alterations, while 2 lesions did not show any pathological finding. At 18F-NaF PET/CT, the 19 bone lesions detected at 18F-FDG PET/TC also demonstrated abnormal tracer uptake, and the other 2 bone iodine avid foci did not show any pathological finding. Conclusions: In patients with DTC, 18F-NaF PET/CT did not obtain more information on the metastatic skeletal involvement than post-therapy 131I WBS and 18F-FDG PET/CT.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Tumor Burden of Iodine-Avid Bone Metastatic Thyroid Cancer Identified via 18F-Sodium Fluoride PET/CT Imaging
- Date Crossref
- 19/01/2024
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.