Aller au contenu principal
2024 article

Evaluating the Impact of Telehealth on Carbon Footprint During Three Phases of the Pandemic at a Rural Academic Medical Center

4Citations signalées — pas une note de qualité
3Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Résumé fourni par la source

Background: Climate change is primarily driven by greenhouse gases, such as carbon dioxide (CO 2 ). Telehealth visits have been found to mitigate carbon emissions by reducing patient and physician transport. Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center (DHMC) is the most rural academic medical center in the country, serving a population where the majority of patients reach the hospital by car. No large study or systematic review has evaluated the impact of telehealth visits on CO 2 emissions (CO 2 e) across multiple specialties in a purely rural setting. Further, no sizable rurally focused study has compared CO 2 e avoided during the various stages of the pandemic. Methods: We extracted data for all outpatient telehealth visits at DHMC from three periods: prepandemic, early pandemic, and late pandemic. The extracted data included the pandemic stage of the virtual visit, the type of visit (video or telephone), the specialty, and the distance from the patient's home to DHMC. Results: The total CO 2 e avoided among all three pandemic stages analyzed in this study was 23,658,898 kg ( n = 251,832). During period 1, the mean driving distance = 159.0 miles; CO 2 e avoided per encounter = 128.3 kg; period 2, mean distance = 84.85 miles; average CO 2 e avoided per encounter = 68.47 CO 2 e kg; and period 3, mean distance = 112.9 miles; average CO 2 e avoided per encounter = 91.08 kg. Conclusions: This data supported long distances to the medical center and large savings in CO 2 e avoided across multiple specialties that spanned all pandemic periods. Further, this level of averted emissions could translate to over $3M in saved fuel costs and the avoidance of six excess deaths. While discussions of the future of telehealth commonly focus on access, use cases, technology, costs, and satisfaction, the impact on carbon footprint is an additional important metric, particularly in largely rural regions.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Evaluating the Impact of Telehealth on Carbon Footprint During Three Phases of the Pandemic at a Rural Academic Medical Center
Date Crossref
15/01/2024
Éditeur
SAGE Publications
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude et ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Sujets associés

Climate Change and Health ImpactsCOVID-19 and healthcare impactsAir Quality and Health Impacts

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Recherche à la demande dans Crossref et Europe PMC, sans clé ; OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant requis, aucune réponse conservée. Sources et limites.