Less-is-more: selecting transcription factor binding regions informative for motif inference
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Numerous statistical methods have emerged for inferring DNA motifs for transcription factors (TFs) from genomic regions. However, the process of selecting informative regions for motif inference remains understudied. Current approaches select regions with strong ChIP-seq signal for a given TF, assuming that such strong signal primarily results from specific interactions between the TF and its motif. Additionally, these selection approaches do not account for non-target motifs, i.e. motifs of other TFs; they presume the occurrence of these non-target motifs infrequent compared to that of the target motif, and thus assume these have minimal interference with the identification of the target. Leveraging extensive ChIP-seq datasets, we introduced the concept of TF signal 'crowdedness', referred to as C-score, for each genomic region. The C-score helps in highlighting TF signals arising from non-specific interactions. Moreover, by considering the C-score (and adjusting for the length of genomic regions), we can effectively mitigate interference of non-target motifs. Using these tools, we find that in many instances, strong ChIP-seq signal stems mainly from non-specific interactions, and the occurrence of non-target motifs significantly impacts the accurate inference of the target motif. Prioritizing genomic regions with reduced crowdedness and short length markedly improves motif inference. This 'less-is-more' effect suggests that ChIP-seq region selection warrants more attention.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Less-is-more: selecting transcription factor binding regions informative for motif inference
- Date Crossref
- 12/01/2024
- Éditeur
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.