Aller au contenu principal
Accès ouvert déclaré 2024 article

Different clinical diagnosis end up in the same pathological diagnosis of intravascular leiomyomatosis: Two case reports

3Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
2Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : cn. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

RATIONALE: Intravascular/intravenous leiomyomatosis (IVL) is a peculiar variant of uterine leiomyoma that is classified as a histologically benign smooth muscle tumor with a biological behavior similar to that of a malignant tumor. It is characterized by the proliferation of leiomyomas spreading along the uterine and extrauterine venous circulation. PATIENT CONCERNS: Herein, we present 2 cases of IVL who had completely different clinical manifestations to stress the need for constant vigilance of IVL diagnosis and the understanding of uterine leiomyoma heterogenicity. Case 1 was registered for fever without specific triggering factors, irregular menstruation and clinically diagnosed uterine diverticula, while no information about fibroids was mentioned. Case 2 was characterized by an aggressively growing abdominal mass. With a large space-occupying lesion in the right abdominopelvic cavity and no imaging evidence of involvement of the iliac vein or above vein, the patient was initially diagnosed with multiple myomata. DIAGNOSES: Both patients' diagnoses were confirmed as IVL by histopathology. To our knowledge, the mass of case 1 is the minimum IVL in the English literature. INTERVENTIONS: Subtotal hysterectomy with bilateral salpingectomy was performed on the former, while total hysterectomy with bilateral salpingectomy was performed on the latter. OUTCOMES: Both patients were comfortable, and no relapse occurred. LESSONS: Two cases in the study showed 2 different proceeding stages of the same disease and corroborated multiple pathogeneses, which have been mentioned in the available literature on IVL. Our work provides both supplement for clinical data to facilitate further research and better understanding of special types of fibroids to clinicians.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Different clinical diagnosis end up in the same pathological diagnosis of intravascular leiomyomatosis: Two case reports
Date Crossref
12/01/2024
Éditeur
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

Uterine Myomas and TreatmentsUrinary and Genital Oncology StudiesGastrointestinal Tumor Research and Treatment

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.