Step selection analysis with non-linear and random effects in mgcv
Rattachement africain : ca, us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract Step selection analysis is used to jointly describe animal movement patterns and habitat preferences. Recent work has extended this framework to model inter-individual differences, account for unexplained structure in animals’ space use, and capture temporally-varying patterns of movement and habitat selection.In this paper, we formulate step selection functions with penalised smooths (similar to generalised additive models) to unify new and existing extensions, and conveniently implement the models in the popular, open-source mgcv R package. We explore non-linear patterns of movement and habitat selection, and use the equivalence between penalised smoothing splines and random effects to implement individual-level and spatial random effects. This framework can also be used to fit varying-coefficient models to account for temporally or spatially-heterogeneous patterns of selection (e.g., resulting from behavioural variation), or any other non-linear interactions between drivers of the animal’s movement decisions. We provide the necessary technical details to understand several key special cases of smooths and their implementation in mgcv , showcase the ecological relevance using two illustrative examples, and provide R code (available at https://github.com/NJKlappstein/smoothSSF ) to facilitate the adoption of these methods. This paper is a broad overview of how smooth effects can be applied to increase the flexibility and biological realism of step selection analysis.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Step selection analysis with non-linear and random effects in mgcv
- Date Crossref
- 05/01/2024
- Éditeur
- openRxiv
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.