Microvascular surgery using surgical loupes versus operating microscope—A single head and neck reconstructive surgeon's experience
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
BACKGROUND: This prospective randomized study evaluates surgical outcomes of head and neck free tissue transfer surgery performed by a single head and neck reconstructive surgeon comparing the use of surgical loupes and the operating microscope. METHODS: Cases using surgical loupes were performed under ×3.5 magnification, whereas cases using the microscope were done using the standard operating microscope. Patient demographics, comorbidities, operative details, surgical outcomes, and flap failure were assessed. RESULTS: Eighty-five free tissue transfer surgeries were included. Of these, 51.8% (n = 44) free tissue transfers were performed using loupe magnification and 48.2% (n = 41) were performed using the operating microscope. Total cases requiring intraoperative microvascular anastomosis revision was 12 (15.4%)-of these, 41.7% (n = 5) were originally performed with surgical loupes and 58.3% (n = 7) were with microscope (p = 0.24). CONCLUSION: The current study provides novel, prospective data regarding a single head and neck reconstructive surgeon's experience at a single academic institution. From this, surgical loupes or the operating microscope can be used to perform head and neck microvascular reconstruction with no significant difference in rates of free tissue transfer failure or perioperative complications or outcomes.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Microvascular surgery using surgical loupes versus operating microscope—A single head and neck reconstructive surgeon's experience
- Date Crossref
- 11/01/2024
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Où se fait cette recherche
-
Henry Ford Hospital pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
-
Corewell Health pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
-
AdventHealth Celebration pays non établi dans la noticeÉtablissement de santé
-
Tulane University pays non établi dans la noticeUniversité ou école supérieure
-
Office of Physician Well‐being and Professionalism pays non établi dans la noticeInstitution
-
Office of Physician Well-being and Professionalism pays non établi dans la noticeInstitution
-
Department of Otolaryngology Advent Health Celebration Florida USA pays non établi dans la noticeOrganisation à but non lucratif
Henry Ford Hospital, Corewell Health et AdventHealth Celebration, avec 4 autres affiliations.
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.