Interdisciplinary nature of scientific maxims of Kazakh linguists (early twentieth century)

Résumé fourni par la source

Linguistics is one of the social sciences and studies the various characteristics and functions of language. Various features of the internal system of language are also studied in relation to linguistics. At the same time, linguistic knowledge develops and changes under the influence of external social phenomena. The authors of the article are convinced of this property of language by applying natural science teachings to the object. This can be argued as a conflictological aspect of linguistics. This means that the conflictological aspect can prove the relevance of the article. The purpose of the article is to differentiate the scientific conclusions of the first Kazakh linguists of a linguobiological nature. This goal requires the solution of at least two tasks: 1) introduces the first Kazakh linguists to the common Eurasian scientific environment and disseminates their scientific and pedagogical works; 2) obliges to solve general interscientific relations through the relations of man and language, language and biology, language and speech, language and thinking. The first scientific works of the first Kazakh scientists are considered as the methodology of the article. In particular, the scientific principles of A. Baitursynuly, K. Zhubanuly, S. Amanzholuly were in the spotlight. Given specific examples and facts related to Turkic languages (Kazakh, Chuvash, Yakut) were given. In addition, materials from the dictionary of the Kazakh literary language and information from Wikipedia provided a lot of methodological information. The article is based on the methods of historical comparison, scientific analysis, analysis and collection. The main results of the article are reflected in the connection between linguistics and natural science. Likewise, the problems of paleontology and pathopsycholinguistics, presented in a small volume, make researchers think and lead to the study of general scientific research in this direction.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.