Recurrent Falls as the Only Clinical Sign of Cortical–Subcortical Myoclonus: A Case Report
Rattachement africain : it. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Some authors use the term cortical-subcortical myoclonus to identify a specific type of myoclonus, which differs from classical cortical myoclonus in that the abnormal neuronal activity spreads between the cortical and subcortical circuits, producing diffuse excitation. The EEG shows generalized spike-and-wave discharges that correlate with the myoclonic jerks. We report the case of a 79-year-old patient with a history of right thalamic deep hemorrhagic stroke, with favorable evolution. Fifteen years later, he was readmitted to the emergency department for episodes characterized by sudden falls without loss of consciousness. An EEG with EMG recording channel on the right deltoid muscle was performed, which documented frequent diffuse spike-wave and polyspike-wave discharges, temporally related to myoclonic jerks in the lower limbs. Brain MRI showed the persistence of a small right thalamic hemosiderin residue at the site of the previous hemorrhage. Antiseizure treatment with levetiracetam was started, with rapid clinical and electroencephalographic improvement. Our case may represent a lesion model of generalized epilepsy with myoclonic seizures. Furthermore, it highlights that lower limb myoclonus of cortical-subcortical origin may be an underestimate cause of gait disturbances and postural instability. Then, it may be reasonable to include the EEG in the diagnostic work-up of patients with recurrent falls.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Recurrent Falls as the Only Clinical Sign of Cortical–Subcortical Myoclonus: A Case Report
- Date Crossref
- 28/12/2023
- Éditeur
- MDPI AG
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.