A real-life prospective blinded evaluation of placental biometry and macroscopic morphology from 1008 unselected consecutive pregnancies

Le résumé fourni par la source

INTRODUCTION: The study of the macroscopic appearance of the placenta may represent a useful tool to understand the pathophysiology of adverse pregnancy outcomes. The aim of this study was to evaluate biometry and morphology of placentas in relation to maternal, neonatal and pregnancy course characteristics. METHODS: Clinical and placental data (biometry and macroscopic features of chorionic disk and adnexa) from unselected consecutive singleton pregnancies were recorded at the same Institution. Placental efficiency was approximated as ratio between fetal and placental weight (FPR). The total population was grouped according to the presence of any maternal comorbidity or pregnancy complication (group 1), neonatal complications diagnosed only at birth (2) and absence of any comorbidity (3). Multi-adjusted general linear and logistic regression models were performed to analyze associations between groups and placental biometry and morphology. RESULTS: The study population counted 1008 pregnancies: 576 (57.2 %) classified as group 1, 76 (7.5 %) as group 2 and 356 (35.3 %) uncomplicated controls (group 3). In multivariate models adjusted for confounding factors, no significant differences in placental biometry and macroscopic features were observed among the three groups. Maternal BMI was significantly associated with higher placental and birth weight and lower FPR; moreover FPR was significantly higher in pregnancies carrying males compared to female neonates. DISCUSSION: Maternal comorbidity or pregnancy disease was not associated with significant changes in placental macroscopic biometry and morphology. Conversely, maternal pregestational BMI and fetal sex impact on placental biometry and efficiency, suggesting different intrauterine adaptations in obese mothers and in male and female fetuses.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.