Orexin‐A attenuated motion sickness through modulating neural activity in hypothalamus nuclei

Le résumé fourni par la source

Abstract Background and Purpose We evaluated the hypothesis that central orexin application could counteract motion sickness responses through regulating neural activity in target brain areas. Experimental Approach Thec effects of intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) injection of orexin‐A and SB‐334867 (OX1 antagonist) on motion sickness‐induced anorexia, nausea‐like behaviour (conditioned gaping), hypoactivity and hypothermia were investigated in rats subjected to Ferris wheel‐like rotation. Orexin‐A responsive brain areas were identified using Fos immunolabelling and were verified via motion sickness responses after intranucleus injection of orexin‐A, SB‐334867 and TCS‐OX2‐29 (OX2 antagonist). The efficacy of intranasal application of orexin‐A versus scopolamine on motion sickness symptoms in cats was also investigated. Key Results Orexin‐A (i.c.v.) dose‐dependently attenuated motion sickness‐related behavioural responses and hypothermia. Fos expression was inhibited in the ventral part of the dorsomedial hypothalamus (DMV) and the paraventricular nucleus (PVN), but was enhanced in the ventral part of the premammillary nucleus ventral part (PMV) by orexin‐A (20 μg) in rotated animals. Motion sickness responses were differentially inhibited by orexin‐A injection into the DMV (anorexia and hypoactivity), the PVN (conditioned gaping) and the PMV (hypothermia). SB‐334867 and TCS‐OX2‐29 (i.c.v. and intranucleus injection) inhibited behavioural and thermal effects of orexin‐A. Orexin‐A (60 μg·kg−1) and scopolamine inhibited rotation‐induced emesis and non‐retching/vomiting symptoms, while orexin‐A also attenuated anorexia with mild salivation in motion sickness cats. Conclusion and Implications Orexin‐A might relieve motion sickness through acting on OX1 and OX2 receptors in various hypothalamus nuclei. Intranasal orexin‐A could be a potential strategy against motion sickness.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.