VT ablation based on CT imaging substrate visualization: results from a large cohort of ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy patients

Le résumé fourni par la source

INTRODUCTION: The eradication of ventricular tachycardia (VT) isthmus sites constitutes the minimal procedural endpoint for VT ablation procedures. Contemporary high-resolution computed tomography (CT) imaging, in combination with computer-assisted analysis and segmentation of CT data, facilitates targeted elimination of VT isthmi. In this context, inHEART offers digitally rendered three-dimensional (3D) cardiac models which allow preoperative planning for VT ablations in ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathies. To date, almost no data have been collected to compare the outcomes of VT ablations utilizing inHEART with those of traditional ablation approaches. METHODS: The presented data are derived from a retrospective analysis of n = 108 patients, with one cohort undergoing VT ablation aided by late-enhancement CT and subsequent analysis and segmentation by inHEART, while the other cohort received ablation through conventional methods like substrate mapping and activation mapping. The ablations were executed utilizing a 3D mapping system (Carto3), with the mapping generated via the CARTO® PENTARAY™ NAV catheter and subsequently merged with the inHEART model, if available. RESULTS: Results showed more successful outcome of ablations for the inHEART group with lower VT recurrence (27% vs. 42%, p < 0.06). Subsequent analyses revealed that patients with ischemic cardiomyopathies appeared to derive a significant benefit from inHEART-assisted VT ablation procedures, with a higher rate of successful ablation (p = 0.05). CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that inHEART-guided ablation is associated with reduced VT recurrence compared to conventional procedures. This suggests that employing advanced imaging and computational modeling in VT ablation may be valuable for VT recurrences.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.