Unveiled Influence of Sub‐gap Density of States on Low‐Frequency Noise in Si‐Doped ZnSnO TFTs: Does Correlated Mobility Fluctuation Model Suffice?
Rattachement africain : kr, jp. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract The presence of low‐frequency noise (LFN) in amorphous oxide semiconductor (AOS) thin‐film transistors (TFTs) is of utmost concern, prompting extensive investigations into the analysis of LFN. However, prior research endeavors have tended to overlook the significance of the sub‐gap density of states (DOS) in the LFN analysis, resulting in an incomplete comprehension. To bridge this knowledge gap, the influence of sub‐gap DOS is demonstrated on LFN in Si‐doped ZnSnO (SZTO) thin‐film transistors (TFTs) under various conditions. The SZTO TFTs is intentionally subjected to positive bias stress and hot carrier stress in order to control the sub‐gap DOS and investigate how this change affects the LFN characteristics. It is revealed that the non‐uniform energetic distribution of sub‐gap DOS induces bias‐dependent excess noise in the SZTO TFTs. Additionally, self‐recovery behavior after the HCS is observed, accompanied by a commensurate reduction in 1/f noise. These empirical observations provide evidence that the conventional correlated mobility fluctuation model used to explain LFN in AOS TFTs is insufficient and underscores the critical importance of considering subgap DOS when analyzing LFN of AOS TFTs.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Unveiled Influence of Sub‐gap Density of States on Low‐Frequency Noise in Si‐Doped ZnSnO TFTs: Does Correlated Mobility Fluctuation Model Suffice?
- Date Crossref
- 17/12/2023
- Éditeur
- Wiley
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.