Spectrophotometric and Topographic Correlations within the Mare Ingenii Swirl Region: Evidence for a Highly Mobile Lunar Regolith
Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract The spectrophotometric properties of two study areas in the Ingenii swirl region show that the combined effects of multiple processes are required to explain the regolith’s mineralogical and physical properties. Production of the swirl regions requires mobilization of the regolith in addition to preferential radiation shielding of subareas. The discovery of topographic correlations between on- and off-swirl (dark lanes) clearly shows that the on-swirl regions are statistically lower than the off-swirl dark lanes by 2–3 m. Photometric analyses show no microscale roughness differences between on- and off-swirl, suggesting no differences in the regolith’s fairy-castle structure between the two swirl regions. The photometric properties of one of the study areas suggest that off-swirl dark lanes may have a more complicated grain structure than on-swirl areas. Enhanced abundances of plagioclase are observed on-swirl in both study areas. Enhanced abundances of FeO and orthopyroxene are observed off-swirl in both areas. No variations in olivine or clinopyroxene abundance were observed for either study area. The discovery of topographic correlations coupled with the similarities in structural properties provides new constraints on the types of processes acting on lunar swirl surfaces.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Spectrophotometric and Topographic Correlations within the Mare Ingenii Swirl Region: Evidence for a Highly Mobile Lunar Regolith
- Date Crossref
- 01/12/2023
- Éditeur
- American Astronomical Society
- Type
- journal-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.