Protein-specific crowding accelerates aging in phase-separated droplets
Rattachement africain : de, us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
ABSTRACT Crowding agents, such as polyethylene glycol (PEG, are often used to mimic the cellular cytoplasm in protein assembly studies. Despite the perception that crowding agents have an inert nature, recent work has shown they are not bystanders while proteins interact. Here, we explore the diverse effects of PEG on the phase separation and maturation of proteins. We use two proteins, the FG domain of Nup98 and bovine serum albumin (BSA), which represent an intrinsically disordered protein and a protein with well-established secondary structure, respectively. PEG expedites the maturation of Nup98, enhancing denser protein packing and fortifying hydrophobic interactions which hasten beta-sheet formation and subsequent droplet gelation. In contrast for BSA, PEG appears to enhance droplet stability and limits available solvent for the protein solubilization, without inducing significant changes to the secondary structure, pointing towards a significantly different behavior of the crowding agent. Interestingly, we detect almost no presence of PEG in Nup droplets whereas PEG is detectable within BSA droplets. Our findings demonstrate a nuanced interplay between crowding agents and proteins. PEG can accelerate protein maturation in LLPS systems but its partitioning and effect on protein structure in droplets is protein specific. This suggests that crowding phenomena are specific to each protein-crowding agent pair.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- Protein-specific crowding accelerates aging in phase-separated droplets
- Date Crossref
- 10/12/2023
- Éditeur
- openRxiv
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.