Genomic plasticity is a blueprint of diversity in Salmonella lineages
Rattachement africain : gb, in, br, dk, my, us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Abstract The flexible genome, organised in regions of genomic plasticity (RGP), serves as a potent facilitator of the dynamic evolution of bacterial genomes through gene acquisition and loss. Here we explored the genomic plasticity across Salmonella lineages, revealing a purposeful, non-random integration pattern of pathogenicity-related gene clusters into specific RGP. Noteworthy examples include the correlation between the type I-E CRISPR-Cas system, gold tolerance, and specific RGP. The scattered prevalence of RGP across Salmonella lineages profoundly shapes the pathogenicity makeup of Salmonella strains. The preferences of RGP seem guided by conserved flanking genes that likely share regulatory and functional coordination. For example, metal resistance genes are predominant in RGP positioned near stress resistance genes, indicating a regulatory network to efficiently counter stressors. Additionally, we observed that different plasmid incompatibility types and prophage genera carry distinct pathogenicity genes. Similar to RGP, their distribution across Salmonella lineages plays a critical role in defining pathogenicity. By uncovering these intricate connections among gene clusters, RGP, mobile genetic elements, and pathogenic attributes, our study offers novel insights into the evolutionary trajectory of Salmonella and holds promise for predicting future adaptations and developing targeted interventions against infections.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé, mais le titre doit être comparé manuellement.
- Titre Crossref
- Genomic plasticity is a blueprint of diversity in <i>Salmonella</i> lineages
- Date Crossref
- 02/12/2023
- Éditeur
- openRxiv
- Type
- posted-content
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.