Aller au contenu principal
2023 conference-abstract

Curative Potential of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel (Axi-Cel): An Exploratory Long-Term Survival Assessment in Patients with Refractory Large B-Cell Lymphoma from ZUMA-1

5Citations signalées, ce qui n’est pas une note de qualité
8Institutions déclarées
1Pays d’affiliation déclarés

Rattachement africain : us. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.

Le résumé fourni par la source

Background: Axi-cel is an autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy approved for patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). Long-term results from ZUMA-1, a multicenter, single-arm, Phase 1/2 study of axi-cel in patients with refractory LBCL, demonstrated sustained overall survival (OS), with a median of 25.8 months and a 5-year estimate of 43% (Neelapu SS, et al. Blood. 2023). Initial assessments of disease-specific survival (DSS) in ZUMA-1 suggested axi-cel may be curative for a subset of patients. However, endpoints defining curative potential in patients with LBCL are not yet clearly established. Here, we report exploratory analyses from the Phase 2 portion of ZUMA-1 using proposed endpoints to measure cure along with survival analyses with up to 6 years of follow-up. Methods: Eligible adults in the pivotal Phase 2 Cohorts (1 and 2) of ZUMA-1 had refractory LBCL (diffuse LBCL, primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma, or transformed follicular lymphoma). Patients were leukapheresed at enrollment, then received lymphodepletion and axi-cel infusion (2×10 6 CAR T cells/kg; Neelapu et al. N Engl J Med. 2017). Exploratory analyses to assess curative potential included lymphoma-related event-free survival (LREFS), duration of complete response (DOCR), and DSS. LREFS was defined as the time from axi-cel infusion until disease progression, initiation of new lymphoma therapy, autologous stem cell transplantation, or death due to progression, whichever was earliest. DSS was defined as time from axi-cel infusion to death due to progression or axi-cel-related adverse events (AEs). Outcomes were analyzed via Kaplan-Meier (KM) estimates and competing risk analyses. Landmark analyses were used to explore prognostic potential of disease status at Week 4 and Months 3, 6, 12 and 24. Results: At a median follow-up of 63.1 months in the 5-year analysis (data cutoff on August 11, 2021), median LREFS was 5.8 months (95% CI, 3.4-13.9) and the 60-month LREFS rate by KM estimate was 33.5%. Among patients who achieved a complete response (CR) as best response (n=59), median DOCR was not reached (95% CI, 12.9 months-not estimable). Median LREFS among those with a CR was not reached (95% CI, 18.4 months-not estimable) and the 60-month LREFS rate was 56.8%. Among those with a CR at Months 12 and 24, 60-month estimated rates of LREFS and ongoing CR were >80% (Table 1). All 3 lymphoma-related events that occurred after Month 24 in those with a CR were disease progression. Among those with a partial response at Week 4 (n=33) and Month 3 (n=10), estimates of 60-month LREFS were 27.3% and 45.0%, respectively. The data cutoff date for the 6-year survival analysis was August 11, 2022. Median OS was 25.8 months (95% CI, 12.8-63.7). In a competing risk assessment of OS, the cumulative incidence of death at 72 months was 61.6%. Between Months 24 and 72, there appeared to be an increase of 6% in the cumulative incidences of death due to progression (40.6% and 46.6%, respectively) and other reasons (5.0% and 11%, respectively), while deaths due to axi-cel-related AEs remained 4.0% at each timepoint. Among patients with a best response of a CR, the cumulative incidence rates of death at Month 24 and Month 72 were 20.3% and 27.2% for progression, 3.4% (both timepoints) for axi-cel-related AEs, and 0% and 10.4% for other reasons, respectively. Those who had a CR at Months 12 and 24 had a 72-month cumulative incidence of death of 18.4% and 14.2%, respectively (Table 2). Additionally, those who had a CR at 12 and 24 months had 72-month KM-estimated DSS of 94.4% and 100%, respectively. Among those with a partial response at Week 4 and Month 3, 72-month cumulative incidences of death were 72.7% and 50.0%, respectively. Conclusion: In this post hoc analysis of ZUMA-1 with up to 6 years of follow-up, axi-cel had long-term LREFS in a substantial proportion of patients, with a 5-year rate of 34% (57% among patients who achieved a CR). Additionally, a CR at 12 and 24 months may be predictive of extended OS. Among patients who achieved a CR, deaths due to axi-cel-related AEs mainly occurred before Month 24. These results demonstrate the curative potential of axi-cel in a subset of patients with R/R LBCL.

Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.

Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert

DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.

Titre Crossref
Curative Potential of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel (Axi-Cel): An Exploratory Long-Term Survival Assessment in Patients with Refractory Large B-Cell Lymphoma from ZUMA-1
Date Crossref
02/11/2023
Éditeur
American Society of Hematology
Type
journal-article

Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.

Les institutions déclarées

Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.

Les sujets associés

CAR-T cell therapy researchBiosimilars and Bioanalytical Methods

BNTIC News n’est pas le producteur de ces données. Les publications sont interrogées à la demande dans Crossref, OpenAIRE, DOAJ, Europe PMC, HAL, DataCite, AfricArXiv, ROR et la Banque mondiale, sans clé d’accès. OpenAlex reste optionnel. Aucun service payant n’est nécessaire et aucune donnée externe n’est enregistrée en base. Consulter les sources et leurs limites.