COVID-19 antibody response by vaccine type and lymphocyte count in RMS patients on ponesimod
Rattachement africain : gb, us, nl, se, ch. Niveau de preuve : code pays fourni par la source.
Le résumé fourni par la source
Background Various factors may impact the humoral response to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination in MS patients treated with S1P receptor modulators, including ponesimod. Objective Characterize SARS-CoV-2 humoral response by vaccine type and pre-vaccination lympho- cyte count in relapsing MS (RMS) patients who have received COVID-19 vaccination while on ponesimod treatment. Methods Patients in Phase 2 extension study receiving ponesimod 20 mg reported COVID-19 vaccination were included in this analysis. Blood samples collected before and at least 3 weeks after vaccination were evaluated with Human SARS-CoV-2 PreSpike IgG enzyme-linked immunoassay. Results Of 32 participants who received mRNA vaccines, 29 (90.6%) met responder criteria. Of 7 partic- ipants who received viral vector vaccines, 5 (71.4%) were responders. Of 6 participants who received inactivated virus vaccines, 2 (33.3%) were responders. Of 4 participants who received mixed or unspecified vaccine types, 4 (100%) were responders. Response to COVID-19 vaccination also varied by lymphocyte count: of 16 participants with pre-vaccination lymphocyte count <500/mm3, 9 (56.3%) were responders. Of 32 participants with lymphocyte count ≥500/mm3, 30 (93.8%) were responders. Conclusion Humoral response to COVID-19 vaccines in RMS patients on ponesimod in the Phase 2 study varied by vaccine type and pre-vaccination lymphocyte count.
Ce résumé expose les affirmations des auteurs. BNTIC ne l’interprète pas comme une validation indépendante des résultats.
Le contrôle bibliographique ouvert
DOI retrouvé dans Crossref DOI retrouvé ; titre concordant.
- Titre Crossref
- COVID-19 antibody response by vaccine type and lymphocyte count in RMS patients on ponesimod
- Date Crossref
- 01/11/2023
- Éditeur
- BMJ Publishing Group Ltd
- Type
- proceedings-article
Ce recoupement confirme des métadonnées liées au DOI. Il ne confirme ni la méthode ni les conclusions de l’étude, et il ne compte pas comme une seconde source scientifique indépendante.
Les institutions déclarées
Une affiliation ne permet pas de déduire la nationalité d’un auteur.